Fuller, I., Large, A., Charlton, Martin, Heritage, George and Milan, David (2003) Reach‐scale sediment transfers: an evaluation of two morphological budgeting approaches. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28 (8). pp. 889-903. ISSN 1096-9837
Preview
MC_reach-scale.pdf
Download (671kB) | Preview
Abstract
This paper compares two approaches used to derive measures of annual sediment transfers within a 1 km long piedmont
reach of the gravel-bed River Coquet in Northumberland, northern England. The techniques utilize: (i) channel planform and
cross-section surveys based on a theodolite/electronic distance measurement (EDM) survey of 21 monumented channel
cross-sections and channel and gravel bar margins; and (ii) theodolite-EDM survey generating a series of x,y,z coordinates,
from which digital elevation models (DEMs) of the reach were constructed. Calculating the difference between DEM
surfaces provided a measure of volumetric change between surveys carried out during the spring of 1999 and 2000. The
use of kriging in DEM generation and differencing permits computation of estimate variances and confidence intervals
for sediment transfer. Error analysis, validating the DEMs using surveyed cross-sections, indicated a mean error between
surveyed and DEM-generated cross-sections of around twice the value of the D50 of the surface sediment in the reach.
Comparison of sediment volumes derived from the two approaches suggests that, compared with the DEM method, monumented
cross-sections underestimate the magnitude of volumetric changes that occur within the reach. The cross-section approach
relies on a simplistic integration of the volumes, whereas DEM differencing provides an estimate at a resolution under the
control of the analyst. Furthermore, the cross-section approach does not permit a reliable estimate of the uncertainty of the
volumes calculated. In addition, the DEM methodology based on the morphological unit scale provides an explicit identification
of spatial patterns of erosion and deposition, a feature that cross-section-based approaches may fail to include.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | gravel-bed river; morphological budget; DEM; kriging; sediment transfer; |
Academic Unit: | Faculty of Science and Engineering > Research Institutes > National Centre for Geocomputation, NCG |
Item ID: | 5904 |
Identification Number: | 10.1002/esp.1011 |
Depositing User: | Martin Charlton |
Date Deposited: | 23 Feb 2015 16:30 |
Journal or Publication Title: | Earth Surface Processes and Landforms |
Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Refereed: | Yes |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/5904 |
Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year