Share and Export
Share and Export
Tillman, Seth Barrett (2006) Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 4. pp. 207-218.
![[thumbnail of 2006.4PIERCE207.TILLMAN.pdf]](https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png "2006.4PIERCE207.TILLMAN.pdf")
PDF
2006.4PIERCE207.TILLMAN.pdf
Download (67kB)
Abstract
This article is published in conjunction with my MODEL CONTINUITY OF CONGRESS STATUTE. Professor Sanford V. Levinson in a comment, appearing with the MODEL, has voiced legal and prudential objections to my proposed statutory solution. This Reply responds to those objections.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | continuity; congress; textualist; Chadha; |
| Academic Unit: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Law |
| Item ID: | 2935 |
| Depositing User: | Seth Tillman |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2012 10:01 |
| Journal or Publication Title: | University of New Hampshire Law Review |
| Publisher: | University of New Hampshire School of Law |
| Refereed: | No |
| URI: | https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/2935 |
| Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
- Item control page
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
