Share and Export
Share and Export
Flanagan, Brian (2006) Judicial Rights Talk: Defects in the Liberal Challenge to Constitutional Review. South African Journal on Human Rights, 22 (2). pp. 173-196. ISSN 0258-7203
![[thumbnail of BF_Judicial_Rights.pdf]](https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png "BF_Judicial_Rights.pdf")
PDF
BF_Judicial_Rights.pdf
Download (153kB)
Abstract
A treatment of recent criticism of judicial review concentrating on its theoretical
consistency, scope and the use it makes of factual premises regarding the composition
of judicial argument and the practice of democratic assemblies. Focussing on the work
of Jeremy Waldron and Mark Tushnet and to a lesser extent that of Thomas Poole, it
concludes that there are serious difficulties with the liberal challenge on each front.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Judicial Rights; Liberal Challenge; Constitutional Review; |
| Academic Unit: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Law |
| Item ID: | 2428 |
| Depositing User: | Brian Flanagan |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Feb 2011 15:36 |
| Journal or Publication Title: | South African Journal on Human Rights |
| Publisher: | Juta & Co, Ltd |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/2428 |
| Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
- Item control page
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
