Bartlett, Oliver and Capewell, Simon (2020) Different ethical standards for different ethical problems? A commentary on ‘Responsibility, Prudence and Health Promotion’. Journal of Public Health, 43 (3). e489-e490. ISSN 1741-3842
Preview
OiverBartlettEthical2021.pdf
Download (86kB) | Preview
Abstract
This short note offers a few comments on the interesting
paper ‘Responsibility, Prudence and Health Promotion’ by
Brown, Maslen and Savulescu. We agree that the development
of NCDs is powerfully influenced by social and environmental forces beyond an individual’s direct control. Thus,
undue emphasis on individuals ‘taking responsibility’ for
making healthy choices is unethical, sometimes stigmatizing
and always unscientific. It ignores the complexity of NCD
causation and promotes ineffective and inequitable NCD
prevention strategies. An emphasis on ‘personal responsibility’ is also a well-recognized distraction tactic used
by supporters of harmful commodity industries such as
tobacco, alcohol and junk food.1 Conversely, effective and
successful strategies such as tobacco control comprehensively address the ‘3As’ of affordability, acceptability and availability.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Healthy choices; ethical behaviour; individual responsibility; |
Academic Unit: | Assisting Living & Learning,ALL institute Faculty of Social Sciences > Law |
Item ID: | 18408 |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa006 |
Depositing User: | Oliver Bartlett |
Date Deposited: | 18 Apr 2024 14:32 |
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Public Health |
Publisher: | Oxford Academic |
Refereed: | Yes |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://mu.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/18408 |
Use Licence: | This item is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike Licence (CC BY-NC-SA). Details of this licence are available here |
Repository Staff Only (login required)
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year